Learning English at school has become too complicated. I believe that a huge number of grammatical rules, which the native speakers never use, is not justified. I agree that it is necessary to learn a lot of words and expressions so that you can feel confident in any situation and be able to support conversation on any topic, at least at an elementary level. But never and nowhere, in any film or interview, you do not hear verbs, for example, in the Past Perfect Continuous and in other, so to speak, "heaped" times. Yes, it is necessary to have an idea of the existence of these grammatical structures, but not to the same degree. That's why I believe that the English language that we study at school should be simplified to the level of conversational practice and an almost elementary, often used grammar.
In my opinion, no language can be simplified just for the sake of easiness. By the way, by trying to make it easier, we might deform it and then much of its beauty would disappear. And besides, by changing the language, we are depriving the student of the real words. I think students should deal with the real language and all its complexity and be exposed to real-life language used by native speakers. English is a difficult language both to learn and to teach, it doesen't mean that we have any right to change it just because we feel like it.
I believe that a huge number of grammatical rules, which the native speakers never use, is not justified. I agree that it is necessary to learn a lot of words and expressions so that you can feel confident in any situation and be able to support conversation on any topic, at least at an elementary level. But never and nowhere, in any film or interview, you do not hear verbs, for example, in the Past Perfect Continuous and in other, so to speak, "heaped" times. Yes, it is necessary to have an idea of the existence of these grammatical structures, but not to the same degree. That's why I believe that the English language that we study at school should be simplified to the level of conversational practice and an almost elementary, often used grammar.
I think english should be simplyfied and made easier because. It is more important, easier way to communicate and understand each over. Than it is to be grammatically correct. It all depends on a person. Still there are advantages and disadvantages of it.
I don't think that English should be simplified. I strongly believe that simplifying languages makes communication between people more primitive and facile. As long as English is an international language, it is senseless to use a simplified language to discuss serious and important things. We need language not only for everyday talking with friends, but also for our career and solid future. After all it should also be mentioned that language is carrier of culture which could be lost if nobody would understand classic English and use it's classic rules.
I believe that simplifying the english language should not hurt. English is not necessary for everyone but to just make a couple of phrases and talk and enough and simplified learning language. But at the same time same people need it in the future for the profession or for moving to the country.Personally for me english is a language that i will not need in depth and i learn the school curriculum . But i also think that without studying the language in depht we can not clearly descride the events.
No need to simplify the language, because they all have their own history and culture! And no language can be simplified just for the sake of ease. Trying to make it easier, we can deform it, and then, together with its complexity, a large part of its beauty will disappear! I think students should deal with real language and all its complexity and be exposed to real life language use by native speakers. This is the only way to teach students to manage in a real conversation.
I think shouldn't cos we must be crammaticaly correct every time.
ОтветитьУдалитьLearning English at school has become too complicated. I believe that a huge number of grammatical rules, which the native speakers never use, is not justified. I agree that it is necessary to learn a lot of words and expressions so that you can feel confident in any situation and be able to support conversation on any topic, at least at an elementary level. But never and nowhere, in any film or interview, you do not hear verbs, for example, in the Past Perfect Continuous and in other, so to speak, "heaped" times. Yes, it is necessary to have an idea of the existence of these grammatical structures, but not to the same degree. That's why I believe that the English language that we study at school should be simplified to the level of conversational practice and an almost elementary, often used grammar.
ОтветитьУдалитьIn my opinion, no language can be simplified just for the sake of easiness. By the way, by trying to make it easier, we might deform it and then much of its beauty would disappear. And besides, by changing the language, we are depriving the student of the real words. I think students should deal with the real language and all its complexity and be exposed to real-life language used by native speakers. English is a difficult language both to learn and to teach, it doesen't mean that we have any right to change it just because we feel like it.
ОтветитьУдалитьI believe that a huge number of grammatical rules, which the native speakers never use, is not justified. I agree that it is necessary to learn a lot of words and expressions so that you can feel confident in any situation and be able to support conversation on any topic, at least at an elementary level. But never and nowhere, in any film or interview, you do not hear verbs, for example, in the Past Perfect Continuous and in other, so to speak, "heaped" times. Yes, it is necessary to have an idea of the existence of these grammatical structures, but not to the same degree. That's why I believe that the English language that we study at school should be simplified to the level of conversational practice and an almost elementary, often used grammar.
ОтветитьУдалитьI think english should be simplyfied and made easier because. It is more important, easier way to communicate and understand each over. Than it is to be grammatically correct. It all depends on a person. Still there are advantages and disadvantages of it.
ОтветитьУдалитьI don't think that English should be simplified. I strongly believe that simplifying languages makes communication between people more primitive and facile. As long as English is an international language, it is senseless to use a simplified language to discuss serious and important things. We need language not only for everyday talking with friends, but also for our career and solid future. After all it should also be mentioned that language is carrier of culture which could be lost if nobody would understand classic English and use it's classic rules.
ОтветитьУдалитьI believe that simplifying the english language should not hurt. English is not necessary for everyone but to just make a couple of phrases and talk and enough and simplified learning language. But at the same time same people need it in the future for the profession or for moving to the country.Personally for me english is a language that i will not need in depth and i learn the school curriculum . But i also think that without studying the language in depht we can not clearly descride the events.
ОтветитьУдалитьNo need to simplify the language, because they all have their own history and culture! And no language can be simplified just for the sake of ease. Trying to make it easier, we can deform it, and then, together with its complexity, a large part of its beauty will disappear! I think students should deal with real language and all its complexity and be exposed to real life language use by native speakers. This is the only way to teach students to manage in a real conversation.
ОтветитьУдалить